For a Good Time, Call...


© 2012 Ray Wong

There is just something endearing and funny about raunchy chick flicks that tickles me. While not as well-conceived as last year's The Bridesmaids, For a Good Time, Call is a good alternative to the serious or testosterone-laden Fall movies.

Lauren (Lauren Miller) is a sheltered junior editor living with her handsome boyfriend Charlie (James Wolk) in Manhattan. Then said handsome boyfriend dumps her, because he thinks they are boring. Heartbroken and without a place to live, Lauren is forced to become roommates with Katie (Ari Graynor), a dizzy blonde who is also friends with Lauren's gay best friend Jesse (Justin Long). At first, Lauren and Katie hate each other not only because of an incident that happened a long time ago in college, but also because they are very different people. Not to mention Lauren, a conservative WASP, finds out what Katie really does for a living -- she is a phone sex operator.

Soon, however, Lauren loses her job and must find a way to pay her rent. Lauren decides to work for Katie, helping her to start her own phone sex line. With Katie's experience and Lauren's business savviness and organization, the business takes off. Lauren beings to loosen up, too, and she realizes they can make more money if they have a second operator. After a near-disaster involving a religious right person (Sugar Lyn Beard), Lauren decides she doesn't want to be boring anymore -- she wants to be the second operator.

Lauren Miller (50/50) has the right mix of sweetness and spunk to pull of the more complicated role of Lauren. At first she is all reserved, uptight and timid, but as the story progresses, she unleashes just enough sexy charm and cattiness that fit the character well. But the standout is Ari Graynor (Celeste & Jesse Forever). Her Katie is so endearing, funny, and wild that we can't help but love her. Better yet, Graynor is not just all brash and raunch -- she brings a sweet sensibility and vulnerability to the role that is quite refreshing. Best of all, Miller and Graynor make a great girl-team.

Justin Long (10 Years) has played gay before, so this time he channels the same energy playing Lauren's and Katie's gay best friend. Unfortunately, his is also a stereotypical "gay best friend" role without a lot of substance. It's all superficial. Mimi Rogers (Hope Springs) and Don McManus (Letters from the Big Man) have a great time playing Lauren's uptight, wealthy parents. Sugar Lyn Beard (50/50) is outrageous as Jesus freak Krissy. James Wolk (You Again) and Mark Webber (Save the Date) play Lauren's and Katie's respective beaus -- Wolk is quietly funny as the boring jerk and Webber exerts a nice dorky charm and earnestness.

Notable cameos include Nia Vardalos (Larry Crowne) as a no-nonsense book editor, as well as Kevin Smith, Seth Rogen, and Ken Marino as a trio of Lauren's and Katie's hilarious clients.

Written by star Lauren Miller (Girls! Girls! Girls!) with Katie Anne Naylon, the story no doubt is based on their own friendship (just look at the names of the two lead characters: Lauren and Katie -- enough said). Let's get the obvious out of the way -- the premise, the language, and the plot are rather raunchy, especially when it comes from a female perspective. However, I love the frankness of the material. Perhaps the situations and characters are somewhat on the caricature side, but this is a comedy! What is great about such raunchy chick flicks is that it is at the core still a chick flick -- it is all about the friendship between these two women, and I think they've done a great job exploring that friendship. Despite their differences, Lauren and Katie (the characters, not the writers) are very similar and they complement each other well.

What is weak about the writing are the minor characters and the lack of depth outside of the relationship between the two leads. Strip away that friendship, what we have would be a shallow shell of a story to sell raunchy jokes and antics, and after a while it can get stale. You can only laugh so much at horny, masturbating guys and in a way, there is certain reversed sexism here -- the men are by and large the butt of the jokes. Even the most endearing male characters are a sissy gay man and a socially inapt nerd. The handsome men are jerks and assholes. Are there any normal guys in this story? And I can't help to wonder about the underlying message, that women don't need men after all. Men are more like accessories. More power to women! But as a man, I kind of find it hard to digest at a deeper level.

Then again, we are not supposed to dig too deep. It is a female buddy comedy about sex and friendship. No need to psychoanalyze this to death. As a comedy, it is rather funny. As a girl movie, it's rather sweet and sensible. In that sense, I'd say, for a good time, see or rent this movie.


Stars: Lauren Miller, Ari Graynor, James Wolk, Justin Long, Mimi Rogers, Don McManus, Mark Webber, Nia Vardalos
Director: Jamie Travis
Writers: Lauren Miller, Katie Anne Naylon
Distributor: Focus
MPAA Rating:  R for strong sexual content, language and some drug use
Running Time: 86 minutes 

Ratings:

Script - 7
Performance - 8
Direction - 7
Cinematography - 7
Music/Sound - 7
Editing - 7
Production - 7

Total - 7.2 out of 10.0 

Premium Rush


© 2012 Ray Wong

One thing for certain, before I started writing, I was thinking hard: "What did I see for the review?" I couldn't so I had to check IMDB. And that's how memorable Premium Rush was to me.

Wilee (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) is a law school dropout in Manhattan who prefers to being a bike messenger to a desk job. He craves the adrenaline rush, and the "live the moment" lifestyle. He's also having an on-and-off-again relationship with fellow worker Vanessa (Dania Ramirez). One afternoon, Wilee takes a rush order from Vanessa's roommate (and his previous classmate -- more on that later), Nima (Jamie Chung), to deliver an important envelope to Chinatown. Apparently, Wilee is the only person good for the job.

It turns out another person is interested in the envelope as well, and that is Bobby Monday (Michael Shannon), a NYPD detective. Wilee, being a stubborn, principled guy, refuses to give Monday the goods. Instead, Monday ruthlessly chases him around Manhattan. After almost being run over a few times, Wilee begins to realize something is really wrong.

He returns to campus and asks Lima what exactly is in the envelope. Nima reveals that she's been involved in an underground money system so she can bring her young son to America, and the envelope contains a receipt of the money that is good as cash. The ticket must be delivered in less than an hour and Nima can't trust anyone else. Wilee decides to help Nima, but the relentless Monday is hot on his trail.

Joseph Gordon-Levitt (The Dark Knight Rises) can't seem to do wrong these days, after having resurrected his career with a string of commercial and critical successes ((500) Days of Summer, 50/50 and Inception, to name a few). Unfortunately, as likable and charismatic as Wilee is, the character is simply too one-dimensional. He is a stereotype. Gordon-Levitt does his best, and he is tremendously charming and physically fit, but the role doesn't offer him much depth.

Dania Ramirez (American Reunion) has yet to find a role that would define her movie career. As Wilee's on-and-off girlfriend and sidekick, Ramirez has the physicality for the job, but that's about it. There really isn't much else there emotionally. Michael Shannon (Jonah Hex) is the perfect go-to guy for the role of Bobby Monday -- he excels in playing someone who is odd, ruthless and we'd love to hate.

The rest of the cast does their part in supporting roles. Wolé Parks (Gossip Girl) plays a typical know-it-all; his physicality is impressive. Jamie Chung (The Hangover 2) succumbs to stereotype by playing the demure, timid, brainy Asian girl. Christopher Pace (Step Up 3D) seems to have a fun time playing a frustrated bike cop, and Aasif Mandvi (Ruby Sparks) does his part as Wilee's obnoxious boss.

Written by blockbuster writers David Koepp (Angels & Demons) and John Kemps (Ghost Town), the screenplay is a typical Hollywood adrenaline rush. It follows the thriller structure closely, starting with an action cliffhanger and then revealing the plot in a sometimes out-of-chronological order. The plot is fast-paced. In fact, the character Wilee is referred to as the Wild Coyote, and that's exactly what the story is -- a live-action version of The Roadrunner and the Coyote. The plot and set pieces, and to a great extent the characters, too, are set up to give us one chase after another.

While these scenes are exhilarating to watch, after a while they become repetitive and tiresome. The worse thing about this movie is that character development is flimsy or non-existent. We're spoon-fed the characters' backgrounds and motivations, and we're expected to accept all that or else the plot would make no sense. The dialogue is trite, and the characters are flat and cliched, from the charismatic hero, his beautiful and resourceful sidekick, to the villains. Furthermore, the plot is convoluted with multiple characters and jumbled timelines. The structure and cast of characters are supposed to give us more chases and action, but the main purpose is to hide how thin the story really is. The entire story seems to be built on a single tagline. It's a true "high concept" movie that Hollywood execs seem to love.

Granted, Koepp also directs and he does everything right by the genre. We have fast cuts, snazzy visuals and exciting stunts. We have the entire city of Manhattan as the backdrop. We have good vs. evil. What can really go wrong?

Well, nothing if you consider this as brainless Sunday afternoon entertainment. And it is exactly that. It's good for 90 minutes, and then you will forget about it. It's the film equivalent of a trashy novel. It may give you a premium rush during its runtime, but don't expect anything premium afterwards.

Stars: Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Dania Ramirez, Michael Shannon, Wolé Parks, Jamie Chung, Christopher Pace, Aasif Mandvi
Director: David Koepp
Writers: David Koepp, John Kemps
Distributor: Sony
MPAA Rating:  PG-13 for some violence, intense action sequences, and language
Running Time: 91 minutes 

Ratings:

Script - 6
Performance - 7
Direction - 7
Cinematography - 8
Music/Sound - 7
Editing - 7
Production - 7

Total - 6.8 out of 10.0 

The Odd Life of Timothy Green


© 2012 Ray Wong

The title of The Odd Life of Timothy Green is a bit misleading. The story really is about the childless couple who become Timothy Green's parents. And what "life"?  Timothy Green didn't even live past one season…

Jim (Joey Edgerton) and Cindy (Jennifer Garner) Green are a young couple who lives in Stanleyville, a small town famous for its pencils. Despite trying for years, Cindy and Jim can't conceive. Devastated by the final verdict, Jim and Cindy write down all their hopes and wishes for their "child" and put the notes in a box, which they bury in their backyard. Then something magical happens. A young boy shows up in their house, and his name is Timothy, the same name that Jim and Cindy picked for their non-existing son. Where did he come from? Did he run away? Then when they see leaves growing out of Timothy's legs, they know.

Acting as Timothy's adoptive parents, Jim and Cindy have to hide the fact about Timothy, especially the fact that he has leaves on his legs. They try to act normal and eventually become a normal family with Timothy, who is everything they ever wish for in a child. Through Timothy, Jim and Cindy get to learn to become parents. They make mistakes, too. They go through all the ups and downs of parenthood. They worry about Timothy. They have hopes and wishes for him. And they want to protect him from bullies and judgmental people such as Jim's absent father (David Morse), Cindy's braggart of a sister (Rosemarie DeWitt) and humorless boss (Dianne Wiest).

And then Timothy falls in love with a free-spirited girl named Joni (Odeya Rush). They intrigue each other. And Timothy tells Joni a secret that he doesn't even tell his parents -- a secret that will eventually change all their lives.

Jennifer Garner (Valentine's Day) is earnest to a fault as Cindy Green. Her portrayal is affecting and sincere, and one only realizes that Garnet must relate to the character and story as a mother herself. It is just that her character is too nice and sweet and kind, almost a stereotype. In comparison, Joel Edgerton (The Thing) has a more complex character to play. Jim Green isn't a perfect father, but at least he tries, to not repeat the mistakes his own father made with him. Edgerton does an admirable job with the character.

CJ Adams (Dan in Real Life) is sweet as Timothy. Though not as talented as Freddie Highmore or Haley Joel Osment, Adams has an innocent charm that is perfect as Timothy Green, who is basically an angel figure, if you will. Odeya Rush (Curb Your Enthusiasm) is lovely as Timothy's crush, Joni. On the cusp of being a young woman, Rush portrays the young girl with just a hint of blossoming sexuality (that stays within the boundary of a PG movie).

The supporting cast is largely serviceable in more conventional and cliched roles. Rosemarie DeWitt (My Sister's Sister) plays a brat rather well. David Morse (Collaborator) is aloof and stoic as Jim's father. Dianne Wiest (Rabbit Hole) seems underused as Cindy's boss, but she shows us a glimpse of her great acting in a oddly-sensual (and a bit inappropriate) scene. Ron Livington (Going the Distance) plays the town bully and Jim's boss with his usual smirks and smarminess.

Written by writer-director Peter Hedges (Dan in Real Life) from actor Ahmet Zappa's (Jack Frost) story, the screenplay is very typical Disney-esque. Something we come to expect from a Disney family movie. With that expectation, we can somewhat tolerate the sappiness and blatant heartstring tugging. Well, to a certain extent. I'm a little surprised, though, by how manipulative the screenplay is. I liked Dan in Real Life and Who's Eating Gilbert Grapes, so I am a fan of Hedges' work. Still, here, I feel that he has given in to Disney to present us with a story that is so over-to-top sugary.

Don't get me wrong. There are genuine heart-warming moments. While many of the characters are cliches, some are quite affecting.  The premise and plot, however, require a huge dose of suspension of disbelief. Even as a fantasy, we must ask what is the point of Timothy's existence? Is it to teach Jim and Cindy how to be parents? There are better ways. Is it for Timothy -- a pure soul -- to touch and change the people around him? The fact is, I don't see a lot of changes? At the end of the movie, the most changed people are Jim and Cindy. The others seem the same to me. In a way, I feel that Zappa and Hedges are trying to hard to create their version of The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. I mean, come on, even the titles sound similar.

Hedges' direction is simple and direct, which actually serves the film quite well. There is a bit of this fantastical, fairytale tone in the production, which also works well. The pacing seems slow in the middle, when the plot doesn't seem to move. Timothy's "secret" is no secret at all -- we all know what it is and where it is leading us. The ending is predictable and in a way anticlimactic. However, I actually like the soft, quiet ending that feels right for the characters.

As a family movie, Timothy Green has all the elements to please and delight. Too bad it's done in such a heavy-handed way, and even if it does manage to squeeze a few tears from the audience, I have a feeling they will come out of the theater feeling a bit manipulated and coerced. 

Stars: Jennifer Garner, Joel Edgerton, CJ Adams, Odeya Rush, Rosemarie DeWitt, David Morse, Dianne Wiest, Ron Livington
Director: Peter Hedges
Writers: Peter Hedges, Ahmet Zappa
Distributor: Walt Disney
MPAA Rating:  PG for mild thematic elements and brief language
Running Time: 105 minutes 

Ratings:

Script - 7
Performance - 7
Direction - 7
Cinematography - 8
Music/Sound - 7
Editing - 7
Production - 7

Total - 7.1 out of 10.0 

Hope Springs

© 2012 Ray Wong


With a generic title such as Hope Springs, the movie is a small, personal project starring two of the world's most versatile and respected actors.

Kay (Meryl Streep) is a housewife who has been married to accountant Arnold (Tommy Lee Jones) for 31 years. They have two grown sons and a doting daughter-in-law. Everything about this family seems ordinary and normal, except that Kay is very unhappy. Her relationship with her husband has become routine. They hardly talk anymore, and there is no intimacy between them. As Kay puts it, they are like two people bunking in the same room, except they don't even sleep in the same room.

One day, Kay decides to do something about it, simply hoping to have a real marriage again. She finds Dr. Feld (Steve Carell), a psychologist in Maine specializing in marriage counseling. Dr. Feld offers a week-long intensive counseling program for $4000. Kay pays for it with her savings, and somehow coerces Arnold (who is very reluctant, to say the least) to go with her.

At first angry at his wife's persistence, Arnold clams up and does not want to participate. He complains about everything and threatens to leave when Dr. Feld starts to question them about the intimate details of their sex life (or the lack of one). Soon, though, Arnold realizes everything isn't all right, and Kay is on the verge of leaving him. To save his marriage, Arnold decides to stick around. In the process, Kay and Arnold rediscover each other.

Fresh off an Oscar win for The Iron Lady, Meryl Streep seemingly can do no wrong. Accustomed, though, to playing strong women, Streep plays against type this time with the role of Kay, a mousy, gentle, passive and hurt housewife whose whole life revolves around her husband, who won't even glance her way during dinner. One must marvel at her subtlety and deft skills and dedication she devotes to every role she plays, and as Kay, Streep just about breaks your heart as you feel her pain and understand her dilemma -- she loves her husband dearly but she can longer live that way. It's a powerful performance and even more difficult to accomplish as the character is so introspective and timid.

Tommy Lee Jones (MIB 3) is excellent as well, playing the husband. His role is much less sympathetic -- in fact, it often comes off as the "bad guy" as he is insensitive, grumpy, cold and uncaring. Jones has the daunting job of making an unlikable character likable, and he has succeeded, at least, in making us care.

Steve Carell (Seeking a Friend for the End of the World) plays it completely straight as Dr. Feld. It seems to be the career path that Carell is determined to follow. But the total lack of humor seems a bit disorienting. Don't get me wrong, he is very good in the role, but I think some humor could have made the role even more interesting. The rest of the solid cast includes Jean Smart (Youth in Revolt) as Kay's supportive colleague, Brett Rice (Footloose) as Arnold's colleague, Elizabeth Shue (Janie Jones) as a sympathetic bartender, and Mimi Rogers (Lucky) as an neighbor.

The screenplay by TV writer Vanessa Taylor (Game of Thrones) does seem to be somewhat slight as far as screenplays are concerned. While slight on plot, the story is more about the relationship and is most noted for its subtlety and subtexts. Through the course of the story, the characters slowly reveal their history and how things went from great to meh. The conflicts are never explosive, but the pain feels deep. Taylor explores long-term relationships from a very reserved, conventional angle -- there are no external conflicts such as extra-marital affairs, domestic violence, alcoholism, etc. Basically, it's about two people who become so familiar with each other that they drift apart over time. I applaud Taylor for tackling such a "mundane" topic in a personal and interesting way. However, I don't really like the ending, which seems to be too simplistic and predictable.

Mostly, though, it's the acting that saves the movie. Granted, Director David Frankel (The Devil Wears Prada) does a good job piecing it together. The movie does feel small and intimate. The pacing sometimes seems slow, because there really isn't that much plot. What Frankel does well is letting his actors work their magic. Of course, Streep and Jones both deliver.

Stars: Meryl Streep, Tommy Lee Jones, Steve Carell, Jean Smart, Ben Rappaport, Marin Ireland, Brett Rice, Elizabeth Shue, Damian Young, Mimi Rogers
Director: David Frankel
Writer: Vanessa Taylor
Distributor: Columbia
MPAA Rating:  PG-13 for mature thematic content involving sexuality
Running Time: 100 minutes 

Ratings:

Script - 7
Performance - 8
Direction - 7
Cinematography - 7
Music/Sound - 7
Editing - 8
Production - 7

Total - 7.5 out of 10.0 

Total Recall


© 2012 Ray Wong

I never quite understand why studios want to remake a classic -- a cult classic, at that -- except for one reason: money. Even then, the movie must be good enough to recoop the escalating costs, let alone make a profit. Unfortunately, I am afraid Total Recall may not be able to do that.

In 2083, Douglas Quaid (Colin Farrell) is a poor factory worker who lives in the colony of the United Federated Britain (UFB) with his beautiful police officer wife Lori (Kate Beckinsale). Quaid lives his peaceful but dull and repetitive life, going to work every day with his best friend Harry (Bokeem Woodbine), but deep down he feels that he is something else, someone different. He's itching to try out Total Rekall where they can implant their customers with any experiences as memories. A botched visit, however, leads Quaid on the run from police. More fascinatingly, Quaid realizes he has skills and intincts of a spy.

He also realizes that his whole life has been a lie -- somehow his memories have been replaced. Lori, in reality, is working for Counselor Cohaagen (Bryan Cranston), a ruthless politician who intends to stage an invasion of the colony to squash the resistance, led by a recluse named Matthias (Bill Nighy). With the help of a rebel named Melina (Jessica Biel), Quaid tries to piece everything together and find out who he really is.

Colin Farrell (Fright Night) is a good actor especially in smaller films and roles such as In Bruges or Crazy Heart. As the action hero of a big-budget sci-fi action-adventure, however, Farrell gets bogged down and buried by all the special effects and stunts. Don't get me wrong, Farrell looks and acts the part, but he just can't rise above the material to make the role his own. Everyone is going to compare him with the original Quaid -- the unimitable Arnold Schwarzennigger. It's no small feat to begin with, and Colin seems lost in the production. I keep wondering if Mark Wahlburg would be a better choice as Quaid.

Kate Beckinsale successfully juggles between action (the Underworld series) and drama (Everybody's Fine), and she does a fine job, albeit one-dimensional (I blame that on the screenwriters, however). Still, as ruthless and beautiful as she is, she is no Sharon Stone, who was brilliant in the 1990 original. Jessica Biel (New Year's Eve) is utterly lost as Melina. She seems to have only two or three expressions, and her character is so underwritten and developed that she may as well be played by a robot.

Bryan Cranston (Rock of Ages) hams it up as Cohaagen. He's larger-than-life and seems to have a great time playing the villain. Bokeem Woodbine (Devil) is serviceable as Harry and has an interesting scene or two. Bill Nighy's (Wrath of the Titans) talent is completely wasted as Matthias, who has maybe five minutes of screentime and not much else to do. John Cho (American Reunion), however, makes good use of his limited screentime as Rekall owner McClane.

Written by Kurt Wimmer (Salt) and Mark Bomback (Unstoppable), the screenplay follows the same structure and general arcs of the original (which was based on Philip Dick's story). They change a few things though, so it's not exactly a remake, but a reboot instead. There is no Mars. No one ever goes there. There are no mutants, but there is a post-apocalyptic world with an oppressive, totalitarian government. Sounds familiar? The problem with the story and plot is that, in order to set itself apart from the original, it settles for something predictable and "safe." We've seen that world before, in V for Vendetta, Bladerunner, I Robot, even Star Wars, to name a few. There is nothing fresh here. In fact, the central theme of "who am I?" echoes eerily films such as The Truman Show, but in a less thought-provoking and profound way.

In fact, everything about the writing and production leans toward the profane. Under Len Wiseman's (Live Free or Die Hard) direction, the movie is loud, busy, face-paced and unrelenting. Granted, there are some eye-popping special effects and set pieces, and certain action sequences are impressive. Kudos to the production designs and art direction as well. They have done a great job creating that universe, and a few "updates" from the original movie are truly imaginative. However, in all that slickness and sophisticated production values and effects, it seriously lacks a heart. We never really have a chance to come to sympathize and relate to Quaid or Melina or Matthias or the rebels. Nothing matters except for the breakneck actions. The relentless nature of the plot leaves us no room to breathe, let alone getting to know and relate to the characters.

Even with the state of the art special effects that make the original look outdated and cheesy, it lacks the original's sense of wonderment, cheekiness, and over-the-top charm. And Mars is a much more interesting place than a nuclear wasteland.

Needless to say, I'm disappointed. With all the money they threw into this, and all the talents involved in the project, it falls way short. Is it entertaining? Definitely. Is it action packed? Absolutely. Is it an eye candy? Of course. But does it leave enough of an impression five minutes after you leave the theater? I am sorry -- I don't recall.


Stars: Colin Farrell, Kate Beckinsale, Jessica Biel, Bryan Cranston, Bokeem Woodbine, Bill Nighy, John Cho
Director: Len Wiseman
Writers: Kurt Wimmer, Mark Bomback (based on Philip K. Dick's short story)
Distributor: Sony
MPAA Rating:  PG-13 for intense sequences of sci-fi violence and action, some sexual content, brief nudity, and language
Running Time: 118 minutes 

Ratings:

Script - 5
Performance - 6
Direction - 7
Cinematography - 8
Music/Sound - 7
Editing - 8
Production - 9

Total - 6.1 out of 10.0